/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 11Q Of what merit is the contention ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Of what merit is the contention that the allowance method lacks the objectivity of the direct write-off method? Discuss in terms of accounting’s measurement function.

Short Answer

Expert verified

In comparison to the allowance method, the direct write-off method proves to be more objectivebut it is also not fully objective.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of Fair Representation

Fair representation can be defined as the representation of the financial information of the business entity that does not contain any material misstatement.

02

Merits of direct write-off method

Under the allowance method of reporting bad debts, the business entity estimates the number of uncollectible assets or accounts receivables based on previous experience. While under the direct write-off method, the bad debts are recognized at the time when they are uncollectible, which provides more accurate financial information. Therefore, the direct write-off method proves to be more objective than the allowance method.

Although the direct write-off method provides more accurate information that assists fair representation, but it is also not fully objective because this method also requires judgment regarding the time when a specific account receivable has become uncollectible.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

(Transfer of Receivables with Recourse) Ames Quartet Inc. factors receivables with a carrying amount of \(200,000 to Joffrey Company for \)160,000 on a with recourse basis.

Which of the following statements is true?

(a) The fair value option requires that some types of financial instruments be recorded at fair value.

(b) The fair value option requires that all noncurrent financial instruments be recorded at amortized cost.

(c) The fair value option allows, but does not require, that some types of financial instruments be recorded at fair value.

(d) The FASB and IASB would like to reduce the reliance on fair value accounting for financial instruments in the future.

What are some steps taken by both the FASB and IASB to move to fair value measurement for financial instruments? In what ways have some of the approaches differed?

On September 30, 2016, Rolen Machinery Co. sold a machine and accepted the customer’s zero-interest-bearing note. Rolen normally makes sales on a cash basis. Since the machine was unique, its sales price was not determinable using Rolen’s normal pricing practices.

After receiving the first of two equal annual installments on September 30, 2017, Rolen immediately sold the note with recourse. On October 9, 2018, Rolen received notice that the note was dishonored, and it paid all amounts due. At all times prior to default, the note was reasonably expected to be paid in full.

Instructions

(1) How should Rolen determine the sales price of the machine?

(2) How should Rolen report the effects of the zero-interest-bearing note on its income statement for the year ended December 31, 2016? Why is this accounting presentation appropriate?

Presented below is information from Perez Computers Incorporated.

July 1 Sold \(20,000 of computers to Robertson Company with terms 3/15, n/60. Perez uses the gross method to record cash discounts. Perez estimates allowances of \)1,300 will be honored on these sales.

10 Perez received payment from Robertson for the full amount owed from the July transactions.

17 Sold $200,000 in computers and peripherals to The Clark Store with terms of 2/10, n/30.

30 The Clark Store paid Perez for its purchase of July 17.

Instructions

Prepare the necessary journal entries for Perez Computers.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.