/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q7IFRS As part of the year-end accounti... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

As part of the year-end accounting process and review of operating policies, Cullen Co. is considering a change in the accounting for its equipment from the straight-line method to an accelerated method. Your supervisor wonders how the company will report this change in accounting. It has been a few years since he took intermediate accounting, and he cannot remember whether this change would be treated in a retrospective or prospective manner. Your supervisor wants you to research the authoritative guidance on a change in accounting policy related to depreciation methods.

Instructions

(a) What are the accounting and reporting guidelines for a change in accounting policy related to depreciation methods?

(b) What are the conditions that justify a change in depreciation method, as contemplated by Cullen Co.?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The change in accounting principles is related to depreciation methods which can be found in IAS 8, paragraphs 32-38

Step by step solution

01

Accounting and reporting guidelines

The guideline for reporting the change in accounting principle is related to the depreciation methods which can be found in IAS 8, paragraphs 32-38 under the heading of changes in accounting estimates.

02

Conditions that justify a change in depreciation methods

According to paragraph 14, the business entity shall change an accounting policy only if the change:

1 Is required by an IFRS or

2 results in the financial statements providing reliable and more relevant information about the effects of transactions other events or conditions on the entity鈥檚 financial position, financial performance, or cash flows.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Indicate the effect鈥擴nderstate, Overstate, No Effect鈥攖hat each of the following errors has on 2017 net income and 2018 net income. 2017 2018 (a) Equipment (with a useful life of 5 years) was purchased and expensed in 2015. (b) Wages payable were not recorded at 12/31/17. (c) Equipment purchased in 2017 was expensed. (d) 2017 ending inventory was overstated. (e) Patent amortization was not recorded in 2018.

(Change in Estimate) Mike Crane is an audit senior of a large public accounting firm who has just been assigned to the Frost Corporation鈥檚 annual audit engagement. Frost has been a client of Crane鈥檚 firm for many years. Frost is a fastgrowing business in the commercial construction industry. In reviewing the fixed asset ledger, Crane discovered a series of unusual accounting changes, in which the useful lives of assets, depreciated using the straight-line method, were substantially lowered near the midpoint of the original estimate. For example, the useful life of one dump truck was changed from 10 to 6 years during its fifth year of service. Upon further investigation, Mike was told by Kevin James, Frost鈥檚 accounting manager, 鈥淚 don鈥檛 really see your problem. After all, it鈥檚 perfectly legal to change an accounting estimate. Besides, our CEO likes to see big earnings!鈥

Instructions Answer the following questions.

(a) What are the ethical issues concerning Frost鈥檚 practice of changing the useful lives of fixed assets?

(b) Who could be harmed by Frost鈥檚 unusual accounting changes?

(c) What should Crane do in this situation?

On January 3, 2016, Martin Company purchased for \(500,000 cash a 10% interest in Renner Corp. On that date, the net assets of Renner had a book value of \)3,700,000. The excess of cost over the underlying equity in net assets is attributable to undervalued depreciable assets having a remaining life of 10 years from the date of Martin鈥檚 purchase.

The fair value of Martin鈥檚 investment in Renner securities is as follows: December 31, 2016, \(560,000, and December 31, 2017, \)515,000. On January 2, 2018, Martin purchased an additional 30% of Renner鈥檚 stock for \(1,545,000 cash when the book value of Renner鈥檚 net assets was \)4,150,000. The excess was attributable to depreciable assets having a remaining life of 8 years. During 2016, 2017, and 2018, the following occurred.

Renner Dividends Paid by

Net Income Renner to Martin

2016 \(350,000 \)15,000

2017 450,000 20,000

2018 550,000 70,000

Instructions On the books of Martin Company,

prepare all journal entries in 2016, 2017, and 2018 that relate to its investment in Renner Corp., reflecting the data above and a change from the fair value method to the equity method.

A partial trial balance of Julie Hartsack Corporation is as follows on December 31, 2018.

Dr. Cr.

Supplies \( 2,700

Salaries and wages payable \) 1,500

Interest receivable 5,100

Prepaid insurance 90,000

Unearned rent 鈥0鈥

Interest payable 15,000

Additional adjusting data:

1. A physical count of supplies on hand on December 31, 2018, totaled \(1,100.

2. Through oversight, the Salaries and Wages Payable account was not changed during 2018. Accrued salaries and wages on December 31, 2018, amounted to \)4,400.

3. The Interest Receivable account was also left unchanged during 2018. Accrued interest on investments amounts to \(4,350 on December 31, 2018.

4. The unexpired portions of the insurance policies totaled \)65,000 as of December 31, 2018.

5. \(28,000 was received on January 1, 2018, for the rent of a building for both 2018 and 2019. The entire amount was credited to rent revenue.

6. Depreciation on equipment for the year was erroneously recorded as \)5,000 rather than the correct figure of \(50,000.

7. A further review of depreciation calculations of prior years revealed that equipment depreciation of \)7,200 was not recorded. It was decided that this oversight should be corrected by a prior period adjustment.

Instructions

(a) Assuming that the books have not been closed, what are the adjusting entries necessary at December 31, 2018? (Ignore income tax considerations.)

(b) Assuming that the books have been closed, what are the adjusting entries necessary at December 31, 2018? (Ignore income tax considerations.)

(c) Repeat the requirements for items 6 and 7, taking into account income tax effects (40% tax rate) and assuming that the books have been closed.

State how each of the following items is reflected in the financial statements. (a) Change from FIFO to LIFO method for inventory valuation purposes. (b) Charge for failure to record depreciation in a previous period. (c) Litigation won in current year, related to prior period. (d) Change in the realizability of certain receivables. (e) Write-off of receivables. (f) Change from the percentage-of-completion to the completed-contract method for reporting net income.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.