/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q4ISTQ. Under IFRS, the retrospective ap... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Under IFRS, the retrospective approach should not be used if:

(a) retrospective application requires assumptions about management’s intent in a prior period.

(b) the company does not have trained staff to perform the analysis.

(c) the effects of the change have counterbalanced.

(d) the effects of the change have not counterbalanced.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The correct answer is an option (a)——when an assumption about management’s intent is required.

Step by step solution

01

Correct Answer

The correct answer is option (a)

02

Explanation

The retrospective method requires the assumption about the company management’s intent for a prior period. IFRS suggests not using the retrospective approach in that case.

03

Explanation for incorrect options

Other options are incorrect because, under IFRS, the retrospective approach can be used in those situations. Other situations can be counterbalanced, not counterbalancing.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In January 2017, installation costs of \(6,000 on new machinery were charged to Maintenance and Repairs Expense. Other costs of this machinery of \)30,000 were correctly recorded and have been depreciated using the straight-line method with an estimated life of 10 years and no salvage value. At December 31, 2018, it is decided that the machinery has a remaining useful life of 20 years, starting with January 1, 2018. What entry(ies) should be made in 2018 to correctly record transactions related to machinery, assuming the machinery has no salvage value? The books have not been closed for 2018 and depreciation expense has not yet been recorded for 2018.

Holtzman Company is in the process of preparing its financial statements for 2017. Assume that no entries for depreciation have been recorded in 2017. The following information related to depreciation of fixed assets is provided to you.

1. Holtzman purchased equipment on January 2, 2014, for \(85,000. At that time, the equipment had an estimated useful life of 10 years with a \)5,000 salvage value. The equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis. On January 2, 2017, as a result of additional information, the company determined that the equipment has a remaining useful life of 4 years with a \(3,000 salvage value.

2. During 2017, Holtzman changed from the double-declining-balance method for its building to the straight-line method. The building originally cost \)300,000. It had a useful life of 10 years and a salvage value of \(30,000. The following computations present depreciation on both bases for 2015 and 2016. 2016 2015 Straight-line \)27,000 \(27,000 Declining-balance 48,000 60,000

3. Holtzman purchased a machine on July 1, 2015, at a cost of \)120,000. The machine has a salvage value of \(16,000 and a useful life of 8 years. Holtzman’s bookkeeper recorded straight-line depreciation in 2015 and 2016 but failed to consider the salvage value.

Instructions (a) Prepare the journal entries to record depreciation expense for 2017 and correct any errors made to date related to the information provided. (Ignore taxes.)

(b) Show comparative net income for 2016 and 2017. Income before depreciation expense was \)300,000 in 2017, and was $310,000 in 2016. (Ignore taxes.)

Equipment was purchased on January 2, 2017, for $24,000, but no portion of the cost has been charged to depreciation. The corporation wishes to use the straight-line method for these assets, which have been estimated to have a life of 10 years and no salvage value. What effect does this error have on net income in 2017? What entry is necessary to correct for this error, assuming that the books are not closed for 2017?

  1. On January 1, 2014, Jackson Company purchased a building and equipment that have the following useful lives, salvage values, and costs. Building, 40-year estimated useful life, \(50,000 salvage value, \)800,000 cost Equipment, 12-year estimated useful life, \(10,000 salvage value, \)100,000 cost The building has been depreciated under the double-declining-balance method through 2017. In 2018, the company decided to switch to the straight-line method of depreciation. Jackson also decided to change the total useful life of the equipment to 9 years, with a salvage value of $5,000 at the end of that time. The equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method.
  2. Instructions (a) Prepare the journal entry(ies) necessary to record the depreciation expense on the building in 2018.
  3. (b) Compute depreciation expense on the equipment for 2018.

On December 31, 2017, before the books were closed, the management and accountants of Madrasa Inc. made the following determinations about three pieces of equipment.

1. Equipment A was purchased January 2, 2014. It originally cost \(540,000 and, for depreciation purposes, the straight-line method was originally chosen. The asset was originally expected to be useful for 10 years and have a zero salvage value. In 2017, the decision was made to change the depreciation method from straight-line to sum-of-the-years’-digits, and the estimates relating to useful life and salvage value remained unchanged.

2. Equipment B was purchased January 3, 2013. It originally cost \)180,000 and, for depreciation purposes, the straight-line method was chosen. The asset was originally expected to be useful for 15 years and have a zero residual value. In 2017, the decision was made to shorten the total life of this asset to 9 years and to estimate the residual value at \(3,000.

3. Equipment C was purchased January 5, 2013. The asset’s original cost was \)160,000, and this amount was entirely expensed in 2013. This particular asset has a 10-year useful life and no residual value. The straight-line method was chosen for depreciation purposes.

Additional data:

1. Income in 2017 before depreciation expense amounted to \(400,000.

2. Depreciation expense on assets other than A, B, and C totaled \)55,000 in 2017.

3. Income in 2016 was reported at \(370,000.

4. Ignore all income tax effects.

5. 100,000 shares of common stock were outstanding in 2016 and 2017.

Instructions

(a) Prepare all necessary entries in 2017 to record these determinations.

(b) Prepare comparative retained earnings statements for Madrasa Inc. for 2016 and 2017. The company had retained earnings of \)200,000 at December 31, 2015.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.