/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} 34PGA_1 The Alright Manufacturing Compan... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

The Alright Manufacturing Company in Rochester, Minnesota, assembles and tests electronic components used in smartphones. Consider the following data regarding component T24 (amounts are per unit):

Direct materials cost \( 80.00

Direct labor cost 20.00

Activity-based costs allocated ?

Total manufacturing product cost ?

The activities required to build the component follow:

Activity Allocation Base Cost Allocated to

Each Unit

Start station Number of raw component chassis 4 * \) 1.50 = \( 6.00

Dip insertion Number of dip insertions ? * 0.30 = 9.60

Manual insertion Number of manual insertions 10 * 0.50 = ?

Wave solder Number of components soldered 4 * 1.90 = 7.60

Backload Number of backload insertions 7 * ? = 4.20

Test Number of testing hours 0.43 * 90.00 = ?

Defect analysis Number of defect analysis hours 0.15 * ?= 12.00

Total activity-based costs \) ?

Requirements

1. Complete the missing items for the two tables.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Activity based cost allocated:$83.1

Total manufacturing product cost:$183.1

No. of dip insertion:32

Total Manual insertion cost:$5

Backload unit cost:$0.6

Total test cost:$38.7

Defect analysis unit cost:$8

Step by step solution

01

Computation of missing figures for activity table

Numberofdipinsertion=TotalDipinsertioncostUnitCost=$9.60$0.30=32

Totalcostofmanualinsertion=No.ofmanualinsertionUnitCost=10$0.50=$5Unitcostforbackload=TotalcostNo.ofbackloadinsertion=$4.27=$0.6Totaltestcost=No.oftestinghoursUnitCost=0.43$90=$38.7Unitcostfordefectanalysis=TotalcostNo.ofanalysishour=$120.15=$80
02

Computation of missing figure for component T24

Activitybasedcostallocated=Startstationcost+Dipinsertioncost+Manualinsertioncost+Wavesoldercost+Backloadcost+Teastcost+Defectanalysiscost=$6+$9.6+$5+$7.6+$4.2+$38.7+$12=$83.1Totalmanufacturingproductcost=Activitybasedcostallocated+DirectMaterialcost+Directlaborcost=$83.1+$80+$20=$183.1

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Refer to Short Exercise S19-10. Haworth desires a 20% target operating income after covering all costs. Considering the total costs assigned to the Client 76 job in Short Exercise S19-10, what would Haworth have to charge the customer to achieve that operating income? Round to two decimal places.


Darrel & Co. makes electronic components. Chris Darrel, the president, recently instructed Vice President Jim Bruegger to develop a total quality control program. 鈥淚f we don鈥檛 at least match the quality improvements our competitors are making,鈥 he told Bruegger, 鈥渨e鈥檒l soon be out of business.鈥 Bruegger began by listing various 鈥渃osts of quality鈥 that Darrel incurs. The first six items that came to mind were:

a. Costs incurred by Darrel customer representatives traveling to customer sites to repair defective products, \(13,000.

b. Lost profits from lost sales due to reputation for less-than-perfect products, \)35,000.

c. Costs of inspecting components in one of Darrel鈥檚 production processes, \(40,000.

d. Salaries of engineers who are redesigning components to withstand electrical overloads, \)65,000.

e. Costs of reworking defective components after discovery by company inspectors, \(50,000.

f. Costs of electronic components returned by customers, \)70,000.

Classify each item as a prevention cost, an appraisal cost, an internal failure cost, or an external failure cost. Then determine the total cost of quality by category.

Question:Roxi, Inc. is using a costs-of-quality approach to evaluate design engineering efforts for a new skateboard. Roxi鈥檚 senior managers expect the engineering work to reduceappraisal, internal failure, and external failure activities. The predicted reductionsin activities over the two-year life of the skateboards follow. Also shown are thepredetermined overhead allocation rates for each activity.


Activity

Predicted Reduction in Activity Units

Predetermined Overhead Allocation Rate per unit

Inspection of incoming raw materials

395

\( 44

Inspection of finished goods

395

26

Number of defective units discovered in-house

1,500

54

Number of defective units discovered by customers

275

73

Lost profits due to dissatisfied customers

100

103

Requirements

1. Calculate the predicted quality cost savings from the design engineering work.

2. Roxi spent \)106,000 on design engineering for the new skateboard. What is the net benefit of this 鈥減reventive鈥 quality activity?

3. What major difficulty would Roxi鈥檚 managers have in implementing this costs-of quality approach? What alternative approach could they use to measure quality improvement?

The Oakman Company manufactures products in two departments: Mixing and Packaging. The company allocates manufacturing overhead using a single plantwide rate with direct labor hours as the allocation base. Estimated overhead costs for the year are $810,000, and estimated direct labor hours are 360,000. In October, the company incurred 20,000 direct labor hours.

Requirements

1. Compute the predetermined overhead allocation rate. Round to two decimal places.

Eason Company manufactures wheel rims. The controller expects the following ABC allocation rates for 2018:

Activity Allocation Base Predetermined Overhead

Allocation Rate

Materials handling Number of parts $ 4.00 per part

Machine setup Number of setups 400.00 per setup

Insertion of parts Number of parts 26.00 per part

Finishing Number of finishing hours 90.00 per hour

Eason produces two wheel rim models: standard and deluxe. Expected data for 2018 are as follows:

Standard Deluxe

Parts per rim 4.0 7.0

Setups per 500 rims 18.0 18.0

Finishing hours per rim 1.0 5.5

Total direct hours per rim 5.0 6.0

The company expects to produce 500 units of each model during the year.

Requirements

2. Prior to 2018, Eason used a single plantwide overhead allocation rate system with direct labor hours as the allocation base. Compute the predetermined overhead allocation rate based on direct labor hours for 2018. Use this rate to determine the estimated indirect manufacturing cost per wheel rim for each model, to the nearest cent.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.