/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q3BP Orbital Communications has opera... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Orbital Communications has operating plants in over 100 countries. It also keeps funds for transactions purposes in many foreign countries. Assume in 2010 it held 150,000 kronas in Norway worth \(40,000. The funds drew 13 percent interest, and the krona increased 6 percent against the dollar. What is the value of the holdings, based on U.S. dollars, at year-end?

(Hint: Multiply \)40,000 times 1.13 and then multiply the resulting value by 106 percent.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The year-end value of the holding will be $479,176.50.

Step by step solution

01

Information provided in question

Value of 150,000 Kronas in 2010 = $40,000

Interest drawn by the funds = 13%

Percentage increase in value of Krona against dollars = 6%

02

Calculation of the value of the holdings

The value of the holdings at year-end will be $479,176.50.

Spotrate=DollarsKronas=40,000150,000=0.2667

Year-endrate=Spotrate×(1+Increaseinvalueofkronas)=0.2667×(1+0.06)=2.827

DepositinKronaafter1year=Initialdeposit×(1+Interestrate)=150,000×(1+0.13)=169,500Krona

Year-endvalueofholding=valueofdepositatyear-end×Year-endrate=169,500×2.827=$479,176.50

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Explain why the bad debt percentage or any other similar credit-control percentage is not the ultimate measure of success in the management of accounts receivable. What is the key consideration?

Biochemical Corp. requires $550,000 in financing over the next three years. The firm can borrow the funds for three years at 10.60 percent interest per year. The CEO decides to do a forecast and predicts that if she utilizes short-term financing instead, she will pay 8.75 percent interest in the first year, 13.25 percent interest in the second year, and 10.15 percent interest in the third year. Determine the total interest cost under each plan. Which plan is less costly?

Nowlin Pipe & Steel has projected sales of 72,000 pipes this year, an ordering cost of \(6 per order, and carrying costs of \)2.40 per pipe.

a. What is the economic ordering quantity?

Neon Light Company of Kansas City ships lamps and lighting appliances throughout the country. Ms. Neon has determined that through the establishment of local collection centers around the country, she can speed up the collection of payments by three days. Furthermore, the cash management department of her bank has indicated to her that she can defer her payments on her accounts by one-half day without affecting suppliers. The bank has a remote disbursement center in Florida.

a. If Neon Light Company has \(2.25 million per day in collections and \)1.05 million per day in disbursements, how many dollars will the cash management system free up?

b. If Neon Light Company can earn 6 percent per annum on freed-up funds, how much will the income be?

c. If the total cost of the new system is $400,000, should it be implemented?

Assume that Atlas Sporting Goods Inc. has \(840,000 in assets. If it goes with a low-liquidity plan for the assets, it can earn a return of 15 percent, but with a high-liquidity plan the return will be 12 percent. If the firm goes with a short-term financing plan, the financing costs on the \)840,000 will be 9 percent, and with a long-term financing plan, the financing costs on the $840,000 will be 11 percent. (Review Table 6-11 for parts a, b, and c of this problem.)

a. Compute the anticipated return after financing costs with the most aggressive asset financing mix.

b. Compute the anticipated return after financing costs with the most conservative asset financing mix.

c. Compute the anticipated return after financing costs with the two moderate approaches to the asset financing mix.

d. If the firm used the most aggressive asset financing mix described in part a and had the anticipated return you computed for part a, what would earnings per share be if the tax rate on the anticipated return was 30 percent and there were 20,000 shares outstanding?

e. Now assume the most conservative asset financing mix described in part b will be utilized. The tax rate will be 30 percent. Also assume there will only be 5,000 shares outstanding. What will earnings per share be? Would it be higher or lower than the earnings per share computed for the most aggressive plan computed in part d?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Business Studies Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.