/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 7 Light intensities, \(I_{1}\) and... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Light intensities, \(I_{1}\) and \(I_{2}\), are measured at depths \(d\) in meters in two lakes on two different days and found to be approximately $$ I_{1}=22^{-0.1 d} \quad \text { and } \quad I_{2}=42^{-0.2 d} $$ a. What is the half-life of \(I_{1} ?\) b. What is the half-life of \(I_{2} ?\) c. Find a depth at which the two light intensities are the same. d. Which of the two lakes is the muddiest?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Lake 2 is muddier. Half-lives can be calculated via logarithms.

Step by step solution

01

Define Half-Life Equation

Half-life is the point at which the intensity is reduced to half of its initial value. For light intensity \(I_1\), the half-life can be expressed by setting \(I_1 = \frac{22^{0}}{2} = 22^{-0.1d}\).
02

Solve for Half-Life of I_1

Set up the equation for \(I_1\) and simplify:\[22^{-0.1d} = \frac{1}{2}\]Taking the logarithm of both sides, we have:\[-0.1d \log 22 = \log\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\]Solve for \(d\):\[d = \frac{\log\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}{-0.1 \log 22}\]
03

Solve for Half-Life of I_2

Similar to Step 2, set \(I_2 = \frac{42^0}{2} = 42^{-0.2d}\).Set up the equation:\[42^{-0.2d} = \frac{1}{2}\]Then take logarithms to get:\[-0.2d \log 42 = \log\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)\]Now solve for \(d\):\[d = \frac{\log\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}{-0.2 \log 42}\]
04

Equate Intensities for Same Depth

Set \(I_1 = I_2\):\[22^{-0.1d} = 42^{-0.2d}\]Taking logarithms:\[-0.1d \log 22 = -0.2d \log 42\]Solving for \(d\):\[d = \frac{\log \left(\frac{42}{22}\right)}{0.1 \log 22 - 0.2 \log 42}\]
05

Analyze Muddiest Lake

The lake exhibiting a quicker reduction in light intensity (larger negative exponent) will have muddier water. Lake 2 has \(I_2 = 42^{-0.2d}\) as compared to \(I_1 = 22^{-0.1d}\). Hence, Lake 2 is muddier because the light intensity decreases faster, implying less light penetrates, indicating muddier conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Half-life Calculation
Half-life is an important concept in many fields, including physics and chemistry. It describes the time it takes for a quantity to reduce to half its initial value. In this context, we're discussing light intensity attenuation in lakes. Here's how to calculate it for given functions like in the exercise:
The light intensity functions are given by exponential values. For example, for intensity \(I_1\), we use the formula \(I_1 = 22^{-0.1d}\). To find the half-life, set \(I_1\) to half of its full value; mathematically, this means solving \(22^{-0.1d} = \frac{1}{2}\). By applying logarithmic techniques, you can solve for \(d\), which tells you the depth at which the intensity is halved.
This same approach is applied to calculate the half-life of \(I_2\) as well. Students should remember that different formulas may have different base values or exponents, which will affect the half-life calculation. Understanding how these variables play into half-life equations will help you interpret physical changes in diverse environments.
Exponential Decay
Exponential decay describes processes where quantities decrease at rates proportional to their current value. It's a common way to model scenarios like radioactive decay, cooling, or, in our case, the attenuation of light in water.
The function \(I = 22^{-0.1d}\) and \(I = 42^{-0.2d}\) are examples of exponential decay. Here, the base of the exponential expression (22 and 42) and the exponent (-0.1 and -0.2) determine the decay rate. Lower bases with larger negative exponents result in faster decay, meaning light intensity reduces more rapidly as depth increases.
Exponential decay functions differ from linear functions mainly because they decrease non-linearly, forming a curve that never quite touches the zero line. It's crucial in understanding natural processes where changes slow down over time.
Logarithmic Equations
Logarithmic equations are often used to solve exponential decay problems, like light attenuation in lakes. Logs help in simplifying exponential equations where direct calculation isn't feasible.
When you encounter equations like \(22^{-0.1d} = \frac{1}{2}\), logarithms transform them into manageable algebraic forms. The application of logs allows you to "bring down" exponents so you can solve for unknowns like depth. In this exercise, using properties of logarithms simplifies the exponential equations to solve for depths where intensities match or reach half-life.
Understanding how to employ log equations efficiently aids in decyphering the relationships between exponential parameters. It also broadens your analytical skills when dealing with exponential decay or growth in a variety of contexts, from natural phenomena to financial applications.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Show that \(A_{t}=0\) for all \(t\) is a solution to Equation 1.18 $$ A_{t+1}-A_{t}=2 \pi k \sqrt{A_{t}} $$ This means that for every \(t,\) if \(A_{t}=0\) and \(A_{t+1}\) is computed from the equation, then \(A_{t+1}=0\) (and, yes, this is simple).

Consider a chemical reaction $$ A+B \longrightarrow A B $$ in which a chemical, \(A,\) combines with a chemical, \(B,\) to form the compound, \(A B\). Assume that the amount of \(B\) greatly exceeds the amount of \(A,\) and that in any second, the amount of \(A B\) that is formed is proportional to the amount of \(A\) present at the beginning of the second. Write a dynamic equation for this reaction, and write a solution equation to the dynamic equation.

Show that the doubling time of \(y=A B^{t}\) is \(1 /\left(\log _{2} B\right)\)

There is a suggestion that the world human population is growing exponentially. Shown below are the human population numbers in billions of people for the decades \(1940-2010\). \(\begin{array}{lrrrrrrrr}\text { Year } & 1940 & 1950 & 1960 & 1970 & 1980 & 1990 & 2000 & 2010 \\ \text { Index, } t & 0 & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 \\ \text { Human Population } \times 10^{6} & 2.30 & 2.52 & 3.02 & 3.70 & 4.45 & 5.30 & 6.06 & 6.80\end{array}\) 1\. Test the equation $$ P_{t}=2.21 .19^{t} $$ against the data where \(t\) is the time index in decades after 1940 and \(P_{t}\) is the human population in billions. 2\. What percentage increase in human population each decade does the model for the equation assume? 3\. What world human population does the equation predict for the year \(2050 ?\)

The equation, \(B_{t}-B_{t-1}=r B_{t-1},\) carries the same information as \(B_{t+1}-B_{t}=r B_{t}\) a. Write the first four instances of \(B_{t}-B_{t-1}=r B_{t-1}\) using \(t=1, t=2, t=3,\) and \(t=4\). b. Cascade these four equations to get an expression for \(B_{4}\) in terms of \(r\) and \(B_{0}\). c. Write solutions to and compute \(B_{40}\) for (a.) \(\quad B_{0}=50 \quad B_{t}-B_{t-1}=0.2 B_{t-1}\) (b.) \(\quad B_{0}=50 \quad B_{t}-B_{t-1}=0.1 B_{t-1}\) (c.) \(\quad B_{0}=50 \quad B_{t}-B_{t-1}=0.05 B_{t-1}\) (d.) \(\quad B_{0}=50 \quad B_{t}-B_{t-1}=-0.1 B_{t-1}\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.