/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 38 Describe what maximum parsimony ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Describe what maximum parsimony is used for in evolutionary biology a. Maximum parsimony hypothesizes that organisms that share the most traits are the most likely to share a common ancestor. b. Maximum parsimony hypothesizes that organisms that share a common ancestor are more likely to have many traits in common. c. Maximum parsimony hypothesizes that events occurred in the simplest, most obvious way, and the pathway of evolution probably includes the fewest major events that coincide with the evidence at hand. d. Maximum parsimony hypothesizes that organisms that display homologous structures are closely related, while organisms that display analogous structures must have diverged much farther in the past.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(c) The pathway of evolution likely includes the fewest major events that match the evidence.

Step by step solution

01

- Define Maximum Parsimony

Maximum parsimony is a principle in evolutionary biology that aims to determine the simplest explanation for the evolutionary pathways of organisms. It is based on the idea that the simplest path with the fewest evolutionary events is the most likely to be correct.
02

- Understand the Hypotheses

Review the different hypotheses provided in the problem statement to understand what each one suggests about maximum parsimony and evolutionary relationships among organisms.
03

- Analyze Option (a)

Option (a) states that maximum parsimony hypothesizes that organisms sharing the most traits are the most likely to share a common ancestor. This is related to the idea of shared traits but does not focus on the simplicity of events.
04

- Analyze Option (b)

Option (b) suggests that organisms sharing a common ancestor are more likely to have many traits in common. This similarly focuses on shared traits rather than on the simplicity of evolutionary events.
05

- Analyze Option (c)

Option (c) states that maximum parsimony hypothesizes that evolutionary events occurred in the simplest, most obvious way, and the pathway includes the fewest major events aligned with the evidence. This directly corresponds to the principle of maximum parsimony.
06

- Analyze Option (d)

Option (d) says that organisms with homologous structures are closely related, while those with analogous structures diverged much earlier. This describes homologous and analogous structures but does not directly address the simplest evolutionary path.
07

- Identify the Correct Hypothesis

Based on the analysis, option (c) correctly describes maximum parsimony since it emphasizes that the simplest and fewest major events are considered to be the most likely evolutionary path.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

evolutionary pathways
In evolutionary biology, understanding the journey of organisms from their common ancestors to their current forms involves studying their evolutionary pathways. These pathways help scientists trace back the ancestry of species, identifying how they diverged from other species over time. By mapping traits such as physical characteristics, genetic sequences, or behaviors, biologists can infer the relationships between species.

Maximum parsimony plays a crucial role here. It guides scientists in selecting the evolutionary pathway that requires the fewest changes, making it a fundamental tool in constructing phylogenetic trees. These trees visually represent the relationships between species and hypothesize the sequence of evolutionary events. By focusing on the simplest, most straightforward pathways, researchers can develop more accurate and comprehensive evolutionary histories.
simplest explanation
The principle of maximum parsimony is grounded in the idea commonly known as Occam’s razor, which suggests that the simplest explanation is often the correct one. In the context of evolutionary biology, this means looking for the evolutionary history that involves the fewest steps. This concept revolves around minimizing the number of evolutionary events, such as genetic mutations, structural changes, and other modifications, needed to explain current observations.

For example, if two species share many similar traits, maximum parsimony would favor a hypothesis suggesting that these traits arose from a common ancestor rather than evolving independently in each species. By applying maximum parsimony, scientists can reduce the complexity and focus on more probable evolutionary scenarios, enhancing their understanding of how different species are related.
evolutionary events
Evolutionary events are the changes that occur over generations, leading to the diversity of life we observe today. These events can include mutations in DNA, natural selection pressures, migrations, and more. When constructing phylogenies, maximizing parsimony involves selecting the tree that postulates the fewest such events necessary to explain the observed data.

In essence, maximum parsimony assumes that evolution tends to follow the simplest path, avoiding unnecessary complexities. This method strives to outline an evolutionary history where the fewest changes—such as gene duplications, losses, or horizontal gene transfers—occur. In doing so, it provides a more streamlined and straightforward explanation for how species have evolved.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Describe an analogous structure. a. A penguin and a seagull both have wings. The penguin uses wings to swim while the seagull uses wings to fly. b. Lizards and whales have similar skeleton structures, but they have a different habitat and lifestyle. c. Birds and butterflies have wings with similar characteristics for flight even though their wings do not share an evolutionary relationship. d. The bone structure in leg of a cat is very similar to the bone structure in the arm of a human, but the functions of the limbs are very different.

The emu in Australia and ostrich in Africa are flightless birds that look similar. One proposed hypothesis was the birds descend from an early common ancestor that spread when the continents were connected. DNA analysis shows that emus and ostriches share more genetic homology with flying birds which live in the same region than with each other. What is the best explanation for these findings? a. This is an example of an early shared ancestor. b. This is an example of convergent evolution. c. This is an example of random DNA homology. d. This is an example of divergent evolution.

Explain the ring of life model. a. The ring of life model is a phylogenetic model where the three domains of life started as distinct groups that could swap genes horizontally with each other in all directions. b. The ring of life model is a phylogenetic model where all three domains of life are said to have developed from a pool of primitive prokaryotes. c. The ring of life model is a phylogenetic model where bacterial and archaeal cells fused to form eukaryotic cells. d. The ring of life model is a phylogenetic model where there is only a single domain of life due to modern DNA analysis.

Barbara McClintock discovered transposons while working on maize genetics. What are the transposons composed of when they are able to shift from one location to another? a. segments of RNA b. Plasmids c. segments of DNA d. proteins

Explain why the classic tree model needs to be revised. a. The model is unable to incorporate DNA evidence. b. The model is erroneously based on many analogous traits, which have no basis in evolutionary relationships. c. The model cannot be experimentally verified. d. The model does not consider the possibility that genes could be transferred between unrelated species.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.