/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q.30 What are the benefits and costs ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

What are the benefits and costs of antibody cross reactivity?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  • Benefits of antibody cross reactivity is enhances the sensitivity of the result and allows for the detection of antigens with low abundance.
  • A potential cost of cross reactivity is an antibody response to parts of the body in addition to the appropriate antigen.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Introduction

Antibody, also called immunoglobulin, a protective protein produced by the immune system in response to the presence of a foreign substance, called an antigen.

02

Step 2. Explanation

The benefits and costs of antibody cross reactivity are :-

  • Cross reactivity of antibodies can be beneficial when it allows an individual's immune system to respond to an array of similar pathogens after being exposed to just one of them.
  • A potential cost of cross reactivity is an antibody response to parts of the body in addition to the appropriate antigen.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A scientist mutates eIF-2 to eliminate its GTP hydrolysis capability. How would this mutated form of eIF-2 alter translation?

a. Initiation factors would not be able to bind to mRNA.

b. The large ribosomal subunit would not be able to interact with mRNA transcripts.

c. tRNAi-Met would not scan mRNA transcripts for the start codon.

d. eIF-2 would not be able to interact with the small ribosomal subunit.

What can be inferred about the relative sizes of the areas

of cortex that process signals from skin not densely

innervated with sensory receptors and skin that is

densely innervated with sensory receptors?

A scientist compares the promoter regions of two genes. Gene A’s core promoter plus proximal promoter elements encompass 70bp. Gene B’s core promoter plus proximal promoter elements encompass 250bp. Which of the scientist’s hypotheses is most likely to be correct?

a. More transcripts will be made from Gene B.

b. Transcription of Gene A involves fewer transcription factors.

c. Enhancers control Gene B’s transcription.

d. Transcription of Gene A is more controlled than the transcription of Gene B.

Thalidomide was a morning sickness drug given to women that caused babies to be born without arm bones. If recent studies have shown that thalidomide prevents the formation of new blood vessels, describe the type of bone development inhibited by the drug and what stage of ossification was affected.

Recent studies suggest that blue light exposure can impact human circadian rhythms. This suggests that blue light disrupts the function of the _____ gland(s).

a. adrenal

b. pituitary

c. pineal

d. thyroid

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Biology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.