Chapter 29: Problem 6
Explain how primary urine is introduced into the Malpighian tubules of an insect.
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 29: Problem 6
Explain how primary urine is introduced into the Malpighian tubules of an insect.
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
The immediate effect of \(\mathrm{ADH}\) on the renal tubules of frogs and mice is the same, yet when \(\mathrm{ADH}\) is secreted, frogs produce urine that is approximately isosmotic to their blood plasma, whereas mice produce urine far more concentrated than their blood plasma. Explain this difference in terms of the factors affecting osmosis in the kidneys of frogs and mice.
Outline how the orientation of nephrons relative to each other imparts gross structure to the kidneys of mammals and birds.
In lab rats studied in a state of antidiuresis, the urea concentration and osmotic pressure in the inner-medullary collecting-duct fluid were about the same as the urea concentration and osmotic pressure in the inner-medullary interstitial fluid. However, the concentration of \(\mathrm{Na}^{4}\) in the collecting-duct fluid was only about one-eighth of the \(\mathrm{Na}^{*}\) concentration in the interstitial fluid, and the collectingduct fluid was rich in \(\mathrm{K}^{+}\)even though the interstitial fluid contained hardly any \(\mathrm{K}^{+}\). How are these results to be explained by the difference in concentrating mechanisms for urea and for inorganic ions?
When researchers first proposed the countercurrent multiplication hypothesis for concentration of urine in the mammalian kidney, there was great resistance to its acceptance in certain quarters. The anatomist Ivar Sperber, whose comparative morphological studies originally helped draw attention to the loops of Henle, pointed out that there were certain rodents in which the anatomy of the kidney should make it relatively simple to sample blood from the hairpin bends of the vasa recta deep in the medulla. Samples of such blood were obtained, and the osmotic pressure of this blood proved to be far higher than the osmotic pressure of blood in the general circulation. This research convinced doubters of the validity of the countercurrent multiplication process. Why does blood at the hairpin bends of the vasa recta have a high osmotic pressure, and why would knowing its osmotic pressure in the cases described provide strong support for the countercurrent multiplication hypothesis?
Drugs that increase urine flow (diuretic drugs) are often employed in the treatment of hypertension (high blood pressure) or other disease states. Three physiological categories of such drugs are ones that (1) function as loop diuretics, (2) inhibit the action of aldosterone, and (3) block \(\mathrm{Na}^{+}\)channels in the collecting ducts. Explain why each of these categories would be expected to increase \(\mathrm{Na}^{+}\)excretion and urine flow. (Hint: Rereading the section on hormones at the end of Chapter 28 might prove helpful.)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.